Which statement about the Attribution-NoDerivs license (CC BY-ND) is accurate?

Which statement about the Attribution-NoDerivs license (CC BY-ND) is accurate?

• A. It allows commercial redistribution only if you modify the work.
• B. It allows redistribution only if you get permission.
• C. It restricts all redistribution.
• D. It allows redistribution unchanged and in its entirety with attribution.

Answer: (D)

The statement reflects how CC BY-ND works: you can share the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you don’t change it and you give proper credit. “No Derivatives” means no edits, remixes, translations, or other modifications, so redistribution must be of the original, unaltered work. “With attribution” requires you to credit the author and provide the license information, so others know the terms you followed. That combination—redistribution unchanged and in its entirety with attribution—best matches what this license allows. If you modify the work in any way, you would no longer be distributing it under CC BY-ND and would need permission or a license that permits derivatives.

The statement reflects how CC BY-ND works: you can share the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as you don’t change it and you give proper credit. “No Derivatives” means no edits, remixes, translations, or other modifications, so redistribution must be of the original, unaltered work. “With attribution” requires you to credit the author and provide the license information, so others know the terms you followed. That combination—redistribution unchanged and in its entirety with attribution—best matches what this license allows. If you modify the work in any way, you would no longer be distributing it under CC BY-ND and would need permission or a license that permits derivatives.